Because Oskar’s grandmother tells
her story non-linearly, intentionally leaving large gaps in the narrative and
never explicitly stating her emotions, she is able to communicate a depth of
emotion to the reader that she could not have with words. For instance, when Oskar’s grandmother
first goes to write her life story, she just types spaces over and over again,
because, as she explains, her “life story was spaces” (176). In sharing those
blank pages, she is able to share with both Thomas and the reader her complex longing,
regret, and other unexplainable emotions.
By inserting blank pages into the narrative, Foer ensures that his
readers do not merely know the sympathetic sorrow of reading that her life is
“two thousand white pages” (124), but instead experience themselves the
disappointment and loss of expecting words on the next page and seeing nothing
but blank space. Similarly, in the
grandmother’s “My Feelings” letter to Oskar, she includes long spaces and line
breaks, although this time she does use some words. These sections are entitled
“My Feelings,” but the grandmother never explicitly states her feelings,
instead using only the rare indistinct metaphor, such as “it felt like crying”
(Foer 84), to describe her emotions.
Her feelings are to be inferred from her stories and her reactions; they
reside in the spaces between her words.
In a way, the grandmother’s stories are more moving and easier for the
reader to absorb because she leaves
out naming the emotions and simply lets the reader experience them in the
details of the story. Had she told
the reader she was “sad” or “jealous” explicitly, then the nuances of her
personal emotions would have been lost.
In contrast to his grandmother’s
vague but emotional passages, Oskar and his friend Mr. Black state information
about the world around them explicitly and work to fill in any knowledge gaps
with explanatory words. For
instance, Oskar keeps a “feelings book” under his pillow (Foer 170) but unlike
the complex, nuanced emotions his grandmother describes, Oskar writes his
feelings simply and explicitly, trying to contain what he feels in a single
word. In a matter of minutes, he
changes “desperate” to “mediocre” to “optimistic, but realistic” to “extremely
depressed” (Foer 170-171). He
continually drastically changes his written feelings, even though his base
emotional state only fluctuates a bit, because each short description of his
emotions is too shallow and simple to completely and accurately describe the
complex, simultaneous emotions he is experiencing. Unlike his grandmother, who
expands her emotional exploration though dozens of pages of tangential writing,
Oskar allows himself only one or two words of emotional expression, which is
always an oversimplified and incomplete description.
By contrasting the ways in which
Oskar and his grandmother communicate emotion, Foer seems to argue that the
best way to communicate emotion is to describe everything but the direct emotion, allowing the fine shades of the feeling to paradoxically
become clearer. Oskar and his
grandmother both talk vaguely about having holes insides of them, but describing
their feelings of loneliness and sadness as empty space, rather than matter, may
actually be the most effective way to communicate the heartbreaking loss they
feel.
the conclusion at the end of this post would work well as the beginning of an argument. To specify even further, I wonder what produces this difficulty of communicating emotions? what creates this disjunction? (in other words, I'd like to see a stronger/clearer indication of the broader cultural argument at work.
ReplyDelete