In its first five chapters, The Crying of Lot 49 seems like the
metaphorical ball of yarn that unravels and unravels without ever revealing a
center. Despite Oedipa’s best
efforts to uncover the mysteries in her life, she never seems to gain a complete
picture – each clue leads only to more questions. For example, when Oedipa goes to The Courier’s Tragedy in the hopes of working out some meaning in
the fact that both Inverarity and the characters in the play are connected with
the “bones of lost battalion in [a] lake” that are “fished up” and “turned into
charcoal” (Pynchon 48), she finds no answer to the questions she entered with,
and leaves puzzling over a new mystery: the meaning of “Trystero” (Pynchon
58). Furthermore, when Oedipa approaches
Stanley Koteks about the WASTE system, he merely tells her about the Nefastis
machine and gives her the address of someone else to talk to, without giving
her any real answers (Pynchon 69).
From the very beginning, Pynchon is
mocking both Oedipa and the reader’s desire to find meaning. In only Chapter 2, when Oedipa and
Metzger are playing Strip Botticelli, Oedipa goes through a “progressive
removal of clothing that seem[s] to bring her no closer to nudity” (Pynchon 28)
– a scene that turns out to mimic both Oedipa and the reader’s futile quests
for meaning throughout the following chapters. It seems that Pynchon is speaking directly through Driblette
when Driblette tells Oedipa, “You can put together clues, develop a thesis, or
several…you could waste your life that way and never touch the truth” (Pynchon
62-63).
Pynchon most likely sent Oedipa on
her difficult, mainly unproductive quests for meaning – first of the bones,
then of the symbol in the Scope bathroom, then of the Trystero – to chastise readers
for constantly searching for meaning in art. Oedipa begins the book “shuffling through a fat deckful of
days which seem…more or less identical” (Pynchon 2), and it is only once she
begins her first mission – to sort out Inverarity’s will – that her days become
exciting and unique. Ironically, however,
it is because there are so few clues
to guide her that Oedipa so wholeheartedly embraces her quests for
meaning. While she is following
clues and gathering evidence, Oedipa is actively in control of her life and
free from the confining routine of her suburban life with Mucho. However, once the mystery is resolved
and Oedipa has no more clues to follow, she knows she will return to her
lackluster life with Mucho. Thus,
Oedipa is motivated not only to keep searching for meaning in the clues she
has, despite her incremental progress, but also to keep perpetually on the
lookout for new mysteries, in order to remain questing for meaning for as long
as she can. In this way, Pynchon is also urging the
reader to take pleasure in the experience of art itself – however confusing or
inarticulate that may be – rather than primarily seeking meaning.
Great reading, Sarah. And you're already working on a thesis for the book...
ReplyDelete