One of the topics that we touched on briefly in class discussion
is the idea of Pynchon making fun of different ways that people search for
meaning where there essentially is nothing. This could take the form of
literary criticism, or in a much more controversial place: religion.
Religion is a sensitive topic, and it is not my intention to
offend anyone or downplay personal beliefs. However I think that there are some
solid parallels that can be drawn, and that it is extremely likely that Pynchon
was pointing to religion as a search for meaning. In the novel, Oedipa
represents the average human being. She is “lost” and does not know where to
turn or what to do with her life, equating herself to Rapunzel being locked
away in a tower because of this feeling of helplessness. She comes to the
conclusion that she should attempt to find something for herself.
The biggest comparison to me comes from Oedipa’s obsession
with the play The Courier’s Tragedy.
She takes notice of the smallest details and stores them away in her mind,
hanging onto them and absolutely determined to make something out of them, or
find a hidden meaning that was left behind for her. She goes as far as she can
to follow the trail of this play, getting her hands on the book that the script
was taken from and then going even farther back to its original roots before
realizing that none of them are the same. They have all been adapted, changed
in some way to suit someone else’s taste and because of this things have been
added into the script that do not carry any meaning at all.
Perhaps this is a way that Pynchon expressed his own views
about religion. The only thing that keeps Oedipa going on her search for
meaning in all of these things is her own faith and strong belief, even when
others tell her that there is nothing there to be found. Pynchon could be
mocking the idea of religion and suggesting that those who believe in it are
foolish because of their continuous search for meaning in nothing and things
that have been changed and adapted over the years, or he could be saying
something else entirely about the idea of faith. In a way, it’s up to the
reader to decide.
I do think there's something to be said about religion here - you might specify further - is it, perhaps, organized religion that's the problem? or religions that place to much emphasis on the "word"?
ReplyDelete