Tuesday, January 24, 2012
Oedipa's Fate
It
is appropriate that Pynchon does not offer a resolution at the end of
The Crying of Lot 49 because if he had, it would have undermined the
rest of the novel. We discussed extensively strategies of meaning
making in the novel and ways in which Oedipa tries to find meaning in
her world. It is a world that seems to be both extremely chaotic but
highly constructed at the same time. Though it may be a futile search, I
do think that Oedipa’s name is significant throughout the novel. I
found the comment in class today about dramatic irony to be interesting.
Though Pynchon does subvert our expectations, there are still important
contributions that the main character’s name brings to the book. Rather
than making connections through the plot lines, I thought of Oedipus
Rex and his role as a character who was locked into his fate. Even
though Oedipus is given away by his parents to avoid the disastrous fate
that had been prophesied, he fulfills it anyways. I think this is
really significant because in spite of difficulties in linking Oedipa’s
story with that of her namesake, she too is a character who lacks the
agency to avoid the destiny that is expected of her as a white,
middle-class, American, heterosexual woman. She is trapped in her tower
and unsuccessful in any attempt to escape. However, this inability to
break boundaries has a strong parallel to the way people understand
society in the post-modern world. There is an awareness of social
constraints, influences, and issues but they remain extremely difficult
to change or work around. I think the passage about Oedipa’s encounter
with Winthrop Tramaine that we discussed in class today is a good
example of this. Though she is offended by his racism, she lacks the
ability to stand up for herself and her beliefs. Despite wanting to
change something about herself, Oedipa lacks the ability to do so and
therefore, things remain the same for her. If Pynchon had tied the ends
up nicely, it would not have fit with the rest of the novel. Oedipa’s
continuous struggle may seem bleak but I think there is hope in the fact
that Oedipa remains searching instead of coming to any false
conclusions. Pynchon’s focus on Oedipa shows that she is aware of a
sense of dissatisfaction which places her outside of the norm and makes
her a model for a person who is uninterested in the oppressive nature of
mid 20th century constraints in America. While Oedipa may or may not fulfill her fate in the end, she is at least willing to move forward. The novel ends with Oedipa
sitting alone, bravely facing her future as Loren Passerine shuts out
the sun and begins the auction which might give her answers and might
not.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
You can certainly build this discussion of Oedipa's lack of agency (or is it her inability to claim agency?) In general, though, this blog posting might be revised into a paper.
ReplyDelete