Could Thomas Pynchon be considered a feminist writer?
When I
first asked myself this question my answer was simple, hell no! After reading his negative portrayal of
Oedipa as this pathetic tragic hero with her incessant failure in every realm
of this novel, I thought to myself, this man must hate women. Pynchon’s hatred of women can be traced to
Oedipa’s character’s inability to make any new steps in her quest without the
input of a male, and her feeling of insignificance in situations where her sexuality
is irrelevant; “Despair came over her, as it will when nobody around has any
sexual relevance to you” (Pynchon 94). Furthermore,
at least three of the males she encounters in the novel have either sexually
propositioned her or have some sexual history with her (i.e. Mucho Maas,
Metzger and Nefastis). I continued to
feel this way throughout the text until I took a step back and examined the satirical
nature of the narrative. In doing so I
realized that Pynchon is not so much writing a social critique of women in general,
rather Pynchon is mocking the lifestyle of the white suburban housewife. Following that train of thought I was able to
develop an argument which supports Thomas Pynchon as being a feminist. Undoubtedly, Oedipa is portrayed as this
pathetic joke throughout the novel, but one must remember her characterization is
as the epitome as a white suburban housewife in the ’60 (sans children). In making fun of Oedipa, Pynchon is in fact
showing what a mockery the female “housewife” prototype is. The novel as a whole can be looked at as
almost a cautionary tale to women, saying that if you continue to mindlessly
follow the societal gender roles of the 60s than your life will be just as
pointless as the roundabout droll of this plot.
The reoccurring theme within this text is that nothing means anything;
therefore, with the central focus of the plot being a 60s housewife, the life
of a housewife in 1960s white suburbia is an endless circle of pointlessness,
confusion and overall disappointment—all in all a life in which nothing means
anything.
It's always good, I think, to take this step back - especially for a novel so satirical. And you make a strong case here for Pynchon's critique of the household model - and the lack of alternatives for women - as perhaps being one of the problems of contemporary America.
ReplyDelete