While reading White Noise,
I have found Heinrich’s character to be the most interesting, and even likeable
character in the book. I have this
reaction toward him because he gets straight to the point, he does not beat
around the bush, and he is honest and quite realistic. I find the other characters frustrating; they
ignore his comments because they are afraid of the truth of what he says. Heinrich is the only character who is willing
to deal with issues head on, not passively. His approach may seem a little
abrasive, but I like that he is willing to throw the issue out there instead of
sweetening them up to make it easier to handle.
Maybe the “white noise” of the book
is the reality that everyone is ignoring.
Whenever Heinrich brings up a subject that makes the family uneasy, they
quickly change the subject, they put it in the background as “white noise”:
‘The real issue is the kind of
radiation that surrounds us every day.
Your radio, your TV, your microwave oven… forget spills, fallouts,
leakages. It’s the things around you in
your own house that’ll get you sooner or later’…. ‘Is this what they teach in
school today?’ Babette said. What
happened to civics, how a bill becomes a law?’ (166-68)
The rest of
the passage continues with the entire family adding to this conversation that
is off-topic. They talk about rocks,
math, history – nothing that has to do with the comments Heinrich just made because
confronting the truth makes them too uneasy.
The
family does the exact same thing with the “airborne toxic event.” A potentially very dangerous event is
happening right outside of their house. Babette
even says to Jack that maybe they should be more concerned about the event, and
he instead of listening, he talks her out of her concern, telling her “these things
don’t happen in places like Blacksmith” (112).
They continue to ignore the situation, let it go on as “white noise” and
instead talk about dinner and bills. Heinrich later tells Jack the weather is about
the change which means the “billowing black cloud” would be heading toward
them, and what is Jack’s response? He
says “I’m the head of a department. I
don’t see myself fleeing an airborne toxic event” (115). They ignore the situation until they decide they
should probably go, not as if it is a life threatening situation, which it
is. I think this is Delillo’s critique
of the desensitization of Americans: nothing seems serious, because things like
“that” don’t happen to people like “us.”
For a debatable argument re: the novel, you should develop your last sentence. You can, I think, be more specific re "Americans" who are "people like us" in the novel? And is their refusal to acknowledge the events part of their attempt to reinforce some type of hierarchy (the separation between "us" and "them"?)
ReplyDelete